Information about M&A advisor fees for selling a business is surprisingly difficult to find. I’m not sure why other M&A professionals are reluctant to discuss fees and even less sure it makes sense in today’s online world. This is a current summary of the fees I’m seeing in the market.
This is an updated excerpt from: Early Exits – Exit Strategies for Entrepreneurs and Angel Investors (But Maybe Not Venture Capitalists).
Since the first version of this post in 2009 there have been a few other posts on M&A fees. Some of the good ones are linked below.
I hope you’ll share your experiences on fees, or other good links, by commenting below.
Update January 2013
There are no industry surveys or databases on M&A Advisory fees. The only ways I know to get information on fees is to ask people directly, from similar posts to this one and from comments like the ones below.
Because the data is so sparse, changes in fees over time are even more difficult to determine.
As we slowly recover from the mortgage crisis and continue to work in an environment where we have the lowest cost of capital in our lifetimes, I am seeing two recent trends in M&A advisory fees:
1. An increase in success fees of 1 to 2% (of total transaction size), and
2. Much more common “minimum fees”
M&A Advisor Fees and Transaction Size
M&A Advisor and Business Broker fees increase with the size of the transaction, but not in direct proportion. Part of the reason is that the amount of work required to sell a larger business can actually be less than that to sell a smaller company. Where this becomes especially evident is at the smaller end of the transaction size range.
M&A professionals that sell businesses fall into three rough categories:
- At the upper end of the range there are the big investment banks and accounting firms with teams devoted to M&A.
- In the middle are mid-sized firms that usually include three to seven professionals, usually called M&A Advisors.
- At the smaller end of the transaction range, most businesses are sold by boutique, one to three person firms usually called Business Brokers.
Understanding the pricing mechanisms for M&A fees is easier if you look at it from the perspective of the professionals doing the transactions. Very large firms have offices in downtown towers with human receptionists and assistants. The mid-sized firms have smaller offices in less expensive buildings, use automated phone answering and have no assistants. The individuals in boutique firms answer their own phones.
For a transaction to make sense for the big firms with downtown offices, the total fees have to be a few million dollars. For the mid-sized firms, the minimum fee size is in the $500,000 to $1.5 million range. Smaller firms can afford to do exit transactions where the fees are only a few hundred thousand dollars.
Typically, the big firms will compete most aggressively for exit transactions above $100 million because these transactions will produce several million dollars in fees. The $20 to 75-million range is the optimum range for the mid-sized firms. Smaller transactions are usually done by specialized boutique firms. These numbers shift up or down depending on how busy the firms are.
The standard M&A Advisor fee model includes a work fee and a success fee. In some cases, it may also include a contingency or break fee.
The Lehman Formula and Ideal Fee Alignment
Some M&A firms still base their M&A fees on the Lehman formula. This formula was created by the old Wall Street firm bankrupted by the mortgage crisis. The formula was originally used for financing engagements, but somehow also came to be applied to M&A transactions.
If you think about it for a few minutes, I think it’s pretty obvious that a simple linear percentage creates much better alignment between the M&A Advisor and the Shareholders.
The ideal alignment is probably closer to the exact opposite of the Lehman formula. Ideally, the M&A firm would be paid a larger percentage of the last million than the first million. The main reason this is not more popular is the difficulty of accurately predicting the fair value of the company at the time the transaction completes (several quarters after the engagement is signed).
M&A Advisor Work Fees, Retainers or Up Front Fees
Work fees are committed to by the company at the beginning of the engagement. Some firms will invoice monthly over the first four to twelve months. This initial fee can also be called a retainer, engagement fee or upfront fee. This covers the M&A Advisor’s direct costs during the initial stages, as well as their contribution to the preparation of the selling documents and due diligence materials.
For larger transactions, the work fees are usually $100,000 or more. For boutique firms working on a $20 to 30-million exit transaction, the work fees are usually in the $50,000 to $75,000 range. At the lower end of the transaction spectrum the work fees don’t usually go below $50,000 because no matter how small the transaction, there is still a fixed amount of early work that has to be done.
There are firms that will charge lower work fees, sometimes in the $30k to $40k range. Lower work fees are often an indication that the firm has people who are not completely busy. For that reason, lower work fees are also more common when the M&A market is not very active.
Interestingly, firms that work on transactions valued under $5 million – usually called “Business Brokers” often do not charge a work fee.
It’s very unusual for an M&A Advisor to undertake an exit transaction without a work fee. Part of the reason is that anyone involved with exits has seen a situation where, at the time of the initial engagement, the shareholders and board are enthusiastic about an exit; but by the time an offer gets to the table the shareholders have reconsidered. This can happen precisely because the M&A Advisor has done a good job, and has shown the current shareholders that the company is worth more than they thought. This alone can result in shareholders changing their minds and deciding to continue to own the company for a while longer.
The work fee is a fair way for the professionals to protect their initial investment in helping to facilitate a transaction. It is also a test of how serious the sellers are to actually sell the company.
M&A Advisor Success Fees
Success fees for selling a business in the $10 to 30-million range are typically 6 to 8% of the final value. This means that the M&A firm that successfully completes a $25-million exit transaction will usually be paid a fee at closing of about $1.5 to 2.0 million.
For transactions over $100 million, success fees are usually in the 2 to 3% range. This means that a firm executing a $100 million exit will typically receive a success fee in the $2 to 3-million range.
Where success fees become more challenging is in the smaller size transactions because the amount of work required to sell a $5-million business is not significantly less than the effort required for a $25-million exit.
Minimum Fees
In 2013, I am seeing minimum fees being charged much more often. This clause in the engagement contract specifies the smallest amount the M&A firm will be paid if a transaction is completed.
I find the psychology of minimum fees fascinating. In my experience, most advisors don’t ask themselves what they are saying to the customer.
Just think about it. If the discussions between the M&A Advisor and their prospective client have been open and realistic, why would the engagement agreement need to include a minimum?
(If you are looking at an M&A engagement agreement and this doesn’t make sense to you yet, please contact me below.)
Why Smaller Transactions Are Often More Work Than Larger Ones
Selling a $5-million company can be more difficult than selling a $25-million company. This is because the buyers for smaller companies tend to be either the junior people in the large company acquisition teams, or the CEOs and CFOs of medium-size companies. Similarly, the legal and accounting professionals tend to be less experienced. Combined, these relatively lower experience levels, and reduced availability, means that smaller transactions often require significantly more time and effort from the M&A Advisor.
Even the smaller boutique M&A firms will not usually want to undertake an exit transaction in which the selling price will be less than $ 5 million. Even at a 10% success fee, a $5 million transaction will only deliver a $500,000 success fee. This is approaching the minimum economic size that even the smaller firms can undertake.
This is why transactions below the $5 million threshold are often done by Business Brokers or individuals who have developed expertise in this area.
Because of the amount of work involved in a $5 million transaction, the success fees are usually in the 10 to 12% range.
While the amount of work required to perform exit transactions is similar whether the company is valued at $5 million or $100 million, the fees for large Investment Banks are higher due to their overhead and perceived prestige.
Other Good Posts on M&A Fees
These are some of the other good posts on M&A fees:
http://www.imergeadvisors.com/ma-advisor-fees/
Please Share Your Data and Links
I’d appreciate hearing from you about your experiences with M&A Advisor fees. The only way I have been able to aggregate this information is by asking CEOs, board members, investors and M&A advisors that I meet. If you have a data point you can share, or another good link on M&A fees, please either leave a comment below or email me directly.



{ 26 comments… read them below or add one }
Comments from http://www.AngelBlog.net
FromTechvibes 2 years ago
Mark Groulx said on Tue, June 23, 2009 at 1:02 PM
We are in the business brokerage business and I would say your analysis was pretty good. I would say 5% is a rough number for the $5 to 20 million range and then goes down from there. Could be a little more on the low end of the range.
mhardwicke 1 year ago
In the UK a commitment fee can be anywhere between £15k-£30k and success fee’s are typically 3% of total deal value.
Andrea 1 year ago
question: when you refer to deal value you mean Enterprise value (including debt)?
advisory work done for trade buyers can contemplate a retainer or commitment fee, however when working for institutional investors (Private Equity, VC etc) this is rarer.
Sucess fees for southern european deals would be quite lower than the figures you point to. Not more than 2% of EV up to 100m. Smaller deals are harder to do, but do not usually command higher rates.
Wingedlion and 2 more liked this
Wingedlion 1 year ago
From the M/E we see the same sort of level of fees, with monthly retainers ($50-250K pm) which are then set off, subject to a successful conclusion.
Hi Basil,
What happens if I own the startup company and the company interested in buying my company approaches me? Who pays the M&A consultant fees then, assuming there even IS an third-part M&A person involved?
I once helped a client write an acquisition proposal, which I’d never done before. It was all very rushed, the proposal had to be written and presented in less than a week. My client wanted to sell his company to another company who worked in the same industry, albeit in a different area of the industry in which they didn’t compete directly. This other client was just starting out into an area of the industry my client was already very established in, so this other client was possibly interest in buying out my client’s business. My client took my proposal and pitched his company directly to the other company without anyone else involved in the pitch. The deal never went through.
Also what about companies seeking M&As who have their own M&A people internally? Do these people get a percentage of the sale? From what I gather in Dragons Den’s Robert Herjavec’s book “Driven”, AT&T, the company who paid around $70 million for Herjavec’s IT security company during the dot-com boom, didn’t pay their internal M&A people any commission (at least, he doesn’t mention it).
I’ll quote at length the part of Herjavec’s book about this acquisition as it’s very interesting:
“People employed in the mergers and acquisitions (M&A) departments of giant corporations fascinate me. They’re all very bright and highly educated, socially secure and well dressed, can mix a great martini, all of that. But I have yet to meet one who has ever started, managed or sold a business … I expected AT&T’s M&A people to work out the usual cluster of ratios and assessments, perhaps questioning me on income estimates, depreciation and other items accountants toss around. Eventually, I assumed, someone would apply a mathematical formula to find my company’s market value and make me a carefully calculated offer.
But they didn’t. The price that AT&T Canada would be offering, I was informed, would be based not on its book value but on its sales revenue. “We’ll be calculating our offer as a multiple of your annual gross income,” one of the M&A team members told me.
I wasn’t sure I had heard him correctly. How can you make an offer based on a company’s revenue alone, ignoring all the other aspects of operating a business? …
It took me a while to realize the answer. The value of my company as a going concern was irrelevant to them. AT&T’s primary concern centered on the scope of our business and the degree of customer satisfaction we were producing, which they could pass along to their customers immediately by purchasing my firm. The move would vault them into a dominant market position where security was concerned, and that was their primary objective. In that light, the time it took to get their money back was not a factor. At least, that’s how it seemed to me …
I didn’t care about the details (of AT&T’s offer). They were paying me a multiple of our revenue. It didn’t matter what that multiple was; any offer based entirely on revenue would be acceptable to me …
The team from AT&T Canada submitted their offer. The price was good. In fact, it was VERY good, and I would have been thrilled to accept it. It was more money than I had ever imagined earning in my entire life.
I turned it down.
I feared that if I accepted their first offer, they might grow suspicious. I had nothing to hide, but neither did I want AT&T to believe I was anxious for them to take the company off my hands. Besides, I don’t believe in ever accepting the first offer in a negotiation, because rejecting it strengthens your bargaining position. They would raise their offer, I expected, and they did. First, they asked for a counter-offer from me, and I quoted a figure twice the size of theirs.
I neither hoped nor expected that AT&T would pay that amount, but I believe they would return with a price somewhere in between. They did, and their new offer was comfortably higher than their original one. After some feigned consideration, I agreed to accept the new price, which was substantially more than their first offer ….
In time the cheque was issued (by AT&T). Was I pleased? Of course I was, in one sense. Yet as much as I acknowledged the impact the deal would have on my family and the personal pride I took In generating a substantial personal net worth, one thought kept running through my mind as I added my signature to the deal: I WISH I HAD ENOUGH MONEY OF MY OWN TO TURN THIS OFFER DOWN”.
So, Basil, was this type of acquisition merely an example of the buying frenzy during the dotcom boom? Or do you think this type of acquisition can still happen today in a similar way today, especially with fortune 500 companies, and even more so with Fortune 100 companies?
Great questions, BSBMill.
Who pays the M&A advisor depends on who the M&A advisor is working for. Often, both the buyer and the sellers have their own.
If an M&A professional is on salary, it’s not unusual that they don’t get a bonus or success fee. In other words, completing a transaction is part of their core job description. On the other hand, they might get paid for a year or more between transactions, so like a lot of things in life – it’s a trade-off.
I chucked when I read your observation about some of the people who work on the M&A teams in the big companies.
Great question at the end – and yes that type of acquisition is still happening. In fact, so far in 2011 the M&A markets have been quite buoyant – not frothy like the pre dot-com-boom, but still a very good time to be selling.
CONGRATULATIONS ON CLOSING YOUR EXIT! That sounds like a well executed negotiation. I hope you do it again.
Basil
Hello there! I simply would like to offer you a huge thumbs up for your excellent info you’ve got here on this post. I’ll be coming back to your web site for more soon.
Glad you found the information valuable.
It’s easier to understand the pricing mechanisms for M and A advisor fees when selling a business if you look at it from the perspective of the professionals doing the transactions.
Thanks, Andrew. I agree.
Hi Basil,
Any idea what kind of success fee range for a $10-30million exit transaction would be applicable in the Gulf countries (UAE, Qatar, Saudi) ?
Suranjan,
Thanks for asking.
While I don’t have direct personal experience in the Gulf countries, I would not expect to see a significant difference from the information above.
I have noticed some regional variations in some parts of America. These seem to be related to the number of competing M&A Advisory firms in the local area.
I hope that’s helpful,
Basil
The above Advisor Work Fees assumes a properly constructed Business Plan and Budgets are in place as well as Accounting Systems and all share registry and other secretarial files are up to date including Board and members meeting minutes, all Compliance work including; taxation, returns and Capital Gains records; other regulatory corporate returns are up to date and available for review.
On top of this specialist taxation (CGT) advise to affect restructure in a manner that protects the value of the owners’ and early investors’ interests is required.
The correcting of these issues is expensive (requiring a multi-disaplinary team) and often attracts fines and penalties
James E. Nash
IVM Network (Australia) Pty Ltd
Excellent point, James.
Yes, the M&A Advisory fees above do NOT include the work required to:
- write the business description, or
- build the financial model, or
- clean up the corporate structure and compliance, or
- analyze the tax
The legal work is also not included, of course.
You are correct that these items can add expense and delay. In some cases, they can even jeopardize the transaction.
Thanks for your excellent comment.
Basil
Gregory Dupuis:
The APMAA has conducted blind survey’s on fee structure before. Generally, individual advisors are reluctant to discuss fees for many reason; not the least of which it could be considered collusion or price fixing tin he U.S.
Good point, Gregory. I hadn’t considered the issue of price fixing. Do you know if the results of the APMAA survey are available?
H Winston Hines, CBI, BiC
Gentlemen (and Ladies) of course we have to be cognizant of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act; however, there are just so many structures for compensation that I think that is what Basil was going for not a fixed fee opinion, but a survey of methods of compensation and a discussion of them…by the way the article is very good and thank you!
Winston – thanks for the positive feedback!
I am a former CEO that has been asked by a profitable $600 million company to work on retainer to find them several $20 to $100M businesses to acquire. The idea is that I would run these companies once they were acquired. This acquisitions would be financed by a large PE group who is a investor in the parent company. What range of retainer should be expected? Should I expect a success fee? And if so how much?
Excellent question, Mike. Because you might end up running the business you’d acquire, I don’t think you should expect a success fee on the transaction. If it was my money that was financing the acquisition, I would want to see you with a fair and equitable amount of equity in the business post-transaction. IMO your upside should become liquid on the sale of that business, not the purchase.
Thank you for a great post. Do you also happen to know average success rate and closing period (in months) of deals sized between 10 to 100 million dollars? Thanks a million!
Excellent questions, Jin.
I have been gathering data on success rate for many years. I used to think the average success rate for M&A Advisors was in the 50 to 66% range. As I got more data, I realized that it is closer to 33%. Yes, that is difficult to believe.
Closing period varies from 6 to 18 months, mostly depending on how ready the company is. My previous record from first contact to money in the bank was 3 months. I helped to close a transaction late last year that was only 63 days. Deals are definitely closing faster.
Good article, you are right we should talk more openly about this, especially why selling small deals can be so expensive. thanks, Ken
By Ken Kinkel
Luis Alberto Figueiredo de Sousa
Excellent indication. I agree with you, an open discussion is good for both advisors and sellers.
Ken and Luis,
Thanks for your encouragement and support.
Dear Basil,
Your range stops on 100 million so could you kindly advise on what would be the estimated M&A advisor fees for selling a business worth around $400-$500 mln? As I understand from few studies in internet it has to be approximately 1%, isn’t it?
Evgen – When the transaction size gets that large, there will be a considerable amount of negotiation on the fees. It will also depend on how much work is involved in preparing the company. You are in the right range – I’d expect something in the $5 to 10 million range.
Within the Canadian context I have seen vendor advisor contracts that upon success the work fee is converted to a prepayment of the success fee, a deposit as you will.
A distinction is drawn whether the sale is of assets or shares of the target.
An asset sale will draw a GST liability. Whereas a successful share sale will be a financial transaction exempt from GST in Canada.
Shareholders/vendors, if individuals, cannot claim input tax credits to recover the GST. Therefore if the work fee is converted under contract to a prepayment of success fee a savings can be achieved.
Careful attention to vendor contract terms can yield transaction savings.
Good point on the GST, Derek. In an asset sale, the applicability of GST depends on the specific tax characteristics of the assets and the “Purchase Price Allocation”. We are seeing a lot more asset sales in cross-border transactions as a result of the new rapid depreciation rules in the US.